Tuesday, January 25, 2005

DVD night: "Amadeus" vs "Sweet Sweetback"

Everything happens for a reason. Everything that comes our way is won, right? Teach em up and kids get right after that intimacy with god or perfection of wisdom chasing like it’s the fucking milk truck and no one wants to end up with gold teeth. Eventually the wake grows so wide only image left in their mind is longing, for its path to find. How are you supposed to know searching for the purpose, searching out the design, just puts you further yearning for the goal, truth?

Root out perfection and there ye shall find god. In “Amadeus” Mozart swivels his baton like a superconductor channeling the Rex Fantastic. Nevermind that Wolfie himself is a giggling ninny besotted by his own desperation for a father’s favor; he sits at his billiard table composing dipping into the inkwell like it’s a reservoir of divine cues. Antonio Salieri would kill to soak up the holy precision, but only fills with narcotic craze that his lifelong study can’t make him a vessel transmitting heavenly melodies. The angels he hears are all blown off course, their wings caught by the storm of progress. But who’s flawless? Mozart’s dad masks himself like he’s ready to preside at an orgy, and scares the opera prodigy’s eyes tight shut. Wolfgang’s middle name is barely uttered in the script but “Amadeus” is Latin for god’s lover.

Music to Salieri is god in mathematical resonance, the lord whose billiard balls bounce just so, just as he determined to strike them. Mozart does not bring the fugal counterpoints that Bach does, but his harmonies sound with a precise beauty that confounds Salieri nonetheless. The Italian hungers and hunts and his empty hands are to the movie like silences that draw tension between notes. Mozart’s real scores are the recitative matching the conflict’s slow rhythm haunt for haunt. The soundtrack of course is brilliant. Breathless Salieri identifies: “And there an oboe, high and unwavering, until a clarinet takes over and forms a phrase of such … longing.”

But this plaintive superscribing woodwind sounds like—that sounds like jazz! The soaring clarinet of “Sweet Sweetback’s Baadasssss Song” runs along high like telephone wires, transmitting escape, branching all over the land. If the Christian God is a clockmaker the jazz god is a blacksmith. Not just for forging new sounds from European instruments and West Indian rhythms, but because his work is never done. He doesn’t wind up his pieces and send them on their way; he stands by the furnace: hammers and mends, shatters and bends. Jazz is variation and invention. Instead of perfect, jazz is exquisite—which means “well chosen.” “Sweetback” is a chase movie and, like Salieri, the cops just can’t find what they seek.

“You can’t get away on wings. But niggers got feet.” Sweetback runs all day and night, wiggling his own magic wand and attracting LAPD like a lightning rod, but all he channeling is Redd Foxx. The black man doesn’t have a father to worry about and he doesn’t look back. When he’s with a woman, she’s the one feeling full with god’s word. Progress in “Sweetback” is an excuse for the police, a murmur from angels. Sweetback gets on by getting off course. Deviation defeats progress. Flawless can’t beat lawless. Haunted and hounded, chased by sirens, Sweetback makes his own path and his own high notes. With the squealing horns and clarinets, he breaks out. He moves with his feet instead of his hands clutching after something. Sweetback’s route is not designed. It hasn’t time for perfection. It’s pounded out and left for detectives to find, puzzle over and pursue.

|

2 Comments:

At 5:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This was too awkward trying to get on the haloscan, so ignore the post there that starts similarly...steviepinhead

A Method to His Madness?

Two posts, two comparisons that appear superficially random, but which actually exhibit a similar structure of nested similarities and oppositions:

1. Famous "great generation" hero-leader from the "dominant" cultural group::famous current generation nonhero-athlete from a maginalized cultural group.

2. Movie (with classical music as the subject) about the rivalry between two "real" European musicians - one a famous oddball and the other a single relatively obscure traditionalist - and their contrasting musical styles - formulaic versus inspired::movie (with modern music as the score rather than the subject) about the conflict between a non-famous non-European "oddball" and the multiple henchmen of law'n'order.

One could then set up a meta-contrast between the two sets of oppositions: real-life celebrities (LeBron:Ike) of different eras (modern:classic) whose fame is earned in arguably-similar ways (achieving victory by successfully innovating within societally-structured "contests") but in different arenas (realpolitik-life'n'death:games-entertainment), all contrasting with the movie-illusional "frames" that embed the real-life, generational, competing musical and personal styles (within the same overall genre of cultural entertainment) of Mozart and Saalieri (in which the fame and success "victory" goes to one rival and the life'n'death survival victory goes to the other, an immortality:mortality oppositon) on the one hand, and the fictional non-generational and non-musical, but implicitly cultural (outlaw:order), clash of fictional characters.

So there's an overarching "frame" contrast which sets up one axis, from which hangs on the one end a second axis of actual famous people embedded in a "real-world" context and on the other end dramatized people embedded in an illusional frame, somewhat like the difference between a scholarly biography and a "novelized" treatment, of the lives of people who are real on the one hand (Mozart and Salieri) and fictional on the other (Sweetback and his "opposition").

There are harmonies between the separately-dangling pairs of contrasts: fame/non-fame is a resonating theme, as are the series of generational (classical:modern, classical formulaic:classical inspired), cultural (classical:jazz, majoritarian:minority), stylistic (traditionalist:rebel. outlaw:ordered, innovative-within-a-structure:innovative-outside-a-structure), and contextual contrasts (historical real war:play war, historical musical rivalry:mortal rivalry, fictional nonmusical but potentially mortal rivalry), and so on.

So random-seeming subjects become the objects in a higly non-random structure of reverberating oppositions. Haphazard disparate items are shown to be connected in a web of meaningful structure, because separate-seeming things aren't REALLY separate from each other and--for better or worse--Lars isn't really separate from anyone else or the rest of "his" reality.

Maybe.

******************

Totally different topic, but in looking at the fuss stirred up between Luke P and the anonymous "Hill," a pun-thought occurred, based on the old cop shop drama "Hill Street Blues." Get it, "Hill" with his "street" slang thing and his ethnic "blues" persona. Seems obvious to me, anyway, that nothing about that guy is real, other than the fact that he may or may not be either older in reality or at least older in taste for TV re-runs. Then again, I have no evidente that Luke P is real either, other than that the system seems to "accept" is name, and some of the rest of the posters seem to know who he "really" is. This may or may not exculpate Lars, depending on (a) the accuracy of my HSB theory and (b) what the rest of you know about what TV Lars does or did watch...

 
At 7:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A Method to His Madness? Part One

Two posts, two comparisons that appear superficially random, but which actually exhibit a similar structure of nested similarities and oppositions:

1. Famous "great generation" hero-leader from the "dominant" cultural group::famous current generation nonhero-athlete from a maginalized cultural group.

2. Movie (with classical music as the subject) about the rivalry between two "real" European musicians - one a famous oddball and the other a single relatively obscure traditionalist - and their contrasting musical styles - formulaic versus inspired::movie (with modern music as the score rather than the subject) about the conflict between a non-famous non-European "oddball" and the multiple henchmen of law'n'order.

One could then set up a meta-contrast between the two sets of oppositions: real-life celebrities (LeBron:Ike) of different eras (modern:classic) whose fame is earned in arguably-similar ways (achieving victory by successfu
steviepinhead | 01.27.05 - 7:56 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It was very awkward to cut-n-pste from Word to haloscan, so I eventually gave up and placed the rest of this post on the old comment system. So read it or don't when and if it appears there.
steviepinhead | 01.27.05 - 8:06 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amadeus is a good movie.
Sam needs to write a fucking post already. I'm glad LArs is posting a bunch, but I miss Sams posts at the same time. If both youse guys were posting as much as LArs is now, this blog would be great.You'd have to re-design the blog for it to be fully great though.
Luke P | 01.27.05 - 11:13 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You re-design it.
SamB | 01.28.05 - 12:09 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Give me the password, or add me to the members list and I'll do it. In seven days, after my self-imposed computer exile is over. It starts tomorrow, btw.
Luke P | 01.28.05 - 3:01 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

yeah i was going to say something too. a new template would be nice and a new logo. i liked the old music-notation-helix better than the sloppy 5-year old on a etchasketch writing
lars | 01.28.05 - 11:42 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Okay Luke. But I want right up top on the right or left, not at the bottom of the page. Also, I want black text on white background.
SamB | 01.28.05 - 12:09 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By "I want right up top on the right or left, not at the bottom of the page." i meant " I want the links, contributors, etc right up top on the right or left, not at the bottom of the page."
Also be sure to include the pullquote code.
SamB | 01.28.05 - 12:11 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope. You do it.
Luke P | 01.28.05 - 6:42 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

how's same gonna redesign the sight when he hasn't time to write?
lars | 01.31.05 - 7:31 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suck a dick! I'm working on something now. Frankly I don't see any reason to redesign. It's easy to read and seems organized.
That's not to say I'm opposed to a redesign. I could do it if there are specific complaints and suggestions for solutions.
I know many take issue with the logo. I've tried twice and people haven't liked it. Someone else give it a go! I'm also fairly limited in what I can do since all I have is paint.
So...how can I help you?
SamB | 01.31.05 - 9:12 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

that logo sucks. also, your blog will never be half the blog mine is.

- asian bill gates
dave | 02.01.05 - 1:04 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Make us a logo then Dave. Seriously. And you're right, our blog will never beat your blog. But that's no reason to stop. You've gotta have goals afterall. Do you want to contribute? A lot of this stuff gets to be a bit erudite and stodgy, we need a dumbass like you to brighten it up. And you don't update yours much anyway.
Let me know if you're interested.

-Asian Tiger Woods
SamB | 02.01.05 - 3:55 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

sam i thought the music notes logo was good, the font maybe a little anarchistic and that's all. bring back the logo with another font (not the etchascketch one). i don't even care if there's a monkey with a type writer.

actually fuck it. i'll make one with my roommate's photoshop.

how are you dave
lars | 02.01.05 - 4:01 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yea, You do it. As I said I don't have photoshop or cool fonts and shit. Be sure to save it as a j-peg and try to make it 647 x 119 pixels. That seems to work best.
You can get the wheel of keys image from ficnonfic.
Then, if you don't know how to put it up, e-mail it to me and I'll do it.
SamB | 02.01.05 - 6:42 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's not like I'm not happy that we're going to have such a cool "frame" for these artistic efforts.

Now if someone who knows how could come up with a more functional comment system...what's the point of a blog without vigorous commentary; it's like masturbation, which is okay in a pinch, compared with righteous sex, which is way beyond okay.

And now, however artistic the frame turns out to be in itself, we need some new stuff in the frame. Get crackin!
steviepinhead | 02.01.05 - 7:16 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fuck Stevie! What do you want? We've got both free comment options available. Aren't you the one that couldn't figure out how to log-in to blogger?
If you want to donate I'm sure there's a better option for a price. Movable type's comments seem to be fine, but then we have to buy a domain and pay for movable type hosting stuff (something I'm into if the other contributor is, but www.keychange.com and www.keychange.net are taken, we could maybe do www.keychange.org). I could figure it out, I just don't know if Lars would want to help pay.
SamB | 02.01.05 - 8:21 pm | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i would have to take the site more seriously to pay for it. not that i'm not serious about it, but i would prefer to focus on doing things i might get paid for...
lars | 02.01.05 - 8:27 pm | #

 

Post a Comment

<< Home